JM: Tell us about the pre-sentencing process: Ivan: During the pre-sentencing process, I was pressured
into taking a plea bargain, but I still refused to
admit to the crime, so I was granted an Alford
plea. During allocution, I still denied the crime
and was never granted a post-plea hearing or
informed of my right to appeal. I was originally
being offered plea bargains of probation before a
second set of accusations formed two sets of
allegations to secure my indictment and have me
convicted on one of the original crimes which had
no corroboration. Bobby: Lots of court dates and bail money so I Didn't have to be in
there until my court proven me guilty I guess you could say.
Pre sentencing is more of a pain in the ass then being in jail
it's all games and bullshit. They never like to cut to chase
JM: Did you have police stop by your house for questioning? If not please give us details on how you came to be arrested. Ivan: When the victim originally accused me of rape, I
was held in jail for sixteen days before being
released on my own recognizance. She made a second
accusation against me a few months later; this
time after having no contact with her. The police
didn't tell me what they were arresting me for.
They just told me who my accuser was. I made a
sarcastic statement, "I should kill her, then you
can send me to Attica," which is invalid in terms
of logic as it is a conditional statement and the
court was trying to prove that I wanted to harm
the victim, but they could obviously perceive that
I didn't want to be punished, and in a conditional
statement, in terms of logic, if the antecedent is
true and the consequent is false, the statement is
invalid. This is irrelevant under "Federal Rules
of Evidence" as defined under Article IV, Rule 402
of Title 28 U.S.C.A. (Appendix) Bobby: I got arrested on the spot.
I was driving and they pulled me over. No one questioned me.
I had a warrant I was on the run for a little bit. But it was fine
no big deal if I didn't get caught then i would still be on the run
JM: What was court like? Please give as many details as you recall. Ivan: The court paid no attention to a witness that was
mentioned in the victim's statement, a police
officer, who could have testified in my favor, for
impeachment purposes, as the court only used my
invalid statement I posted above to secure my
indictment which showed no corroboration for what
I ended up being convicted for. This is called
"Brady Disclosure" based on a Supreme Court case
titled Brady v. Maryland which violated my rights
as the district attorney should have brought that
officer to testify. Bobby: Well I was waiting a very long time I has no lawyer.
Or nothing my palms were sweaty and aoon as I got called
Up to the stand the judge laughed at me. And knew exactly
who I was.
I got locked up on the spot there . I did wrong but they didn't
care about no excuse at all
JM: What were your original charges? What did you end up being convicted of? Ivan: Two separate sets of allegations as I was accused
on April 07, 2001, for: Rape 1st, Sexual Abuse
1st, Assault, 2nd, and Unlawful Imprisonment 2nd;
and for August 25, 2001, for: Burglary 2nd,
Assault 2nd, and Criminal Possession of a Weapon
3rd. I was convicted for Rape 1st by an Alford
plea where I pleaded guilty, but I didn't admit to
the crime. Bobby: Possession of stolen properly, assault, driving with out a
license, traffic tickets
..